Ny Casino Voter Referendum Wording Challenged by Attorney

Ny Casino Voter Referendum Wording Challenged by Attorney

A November New York State casino referendum for voters has one lawyer questioning the ballot’s wording

In November, ny voters are scheduled to vote for a referendum that could allow several casino that is new to be built through the state. But if one Brooklyn lawyer is successful, that referendum will be halted due to language within the ballot question that he claims violates state legislation.

Referendum Language Questioned

The language in the referendum carries a amount of ‘legislative purposes’ that paint the proposition in a light that is unmistakably positive. For instance, the question mentions ‘promoting task growth, increasing aid to schools and permitting regional governments to lower property taxes.’ That language was authorized by the State Board of Elections in July.

But now, lawyer Eric J. Snyder is contending that the language in the bill violates New York legislation. Based on a lawsuit filed in the ny State Supreme Court, Snyder alleges that the language violates the State Constitution’s prohibition on the use of public money in the aid of ‘private undertakings.’

‘The Constitution is pretty clear that you cannot use general public money to sway or influence a vote,’ Snyder said.

Snyder isn’t the one that is only has taken up problems with the language in the referendum. Many government watchdog groups also notice it as one-sided, and religious teams have also noted the language used whenever telling parishioners to consider social ills that could come with the advertised great things about casino expansion. Continue reading Ny Casino Voter Referendum Wording Challenged by Attorney