towards the very very early tenth century B.C.E. and also the reign of King David. Confronted with a night out together for Qeiyafa that confirms the standard high chronology that is bible the reduced chronology вЂњminimalistsвЂќ now desperately argue that Qeiyafa had been a Philistine fort associated with the kingdom of Gath, maybe not a edge fortress regarding the early Judahite state. But archaeology states otherwise.
ThereвЂ™s been a complete lot of debate across the problem of Bible chronology, which more specifically pertains to the period associated with the reigns of David and Solomon. Did they reside in the period that is archaeological as Iron Age we, which will be archaeologically badly documented, or in Iron Age IIa, for which more proof can be acquired. Proponents of low Bible chronology, called minimalists, claim the change took place around 920 to 900 B.C. Proponents of a high chronology that is bible the date around 1000 to 980 B.C. Continue reading The imposing Judahite fortress of Khirbet Qeiyafa happens to be firmly dated by pottery and radiocarbon analysis